DIRECTIONS for the question:Read the information given below and answer the question that follows.
Nilu has never received a violation from the Federal Aviation Administration during her 16-year flying career. Nilu must be a great pilot.
Which of the following can be said about the reasoning above?
A)
The definitions of the terms create ambiguity
B)
The argument uses circular reasoning
C)
The argument is built upon hidden assumptions
D)
The argument works by analogy
C
Nilu must be a great pilot has been concluded on the basis that Nilu never received a violation….So there is an assumption. That anybody who does not receive violation from FAA must be a great pilot.
